Uniqode
vs SampleSync
Scan counts vs. scan intelligence.
Uniqode tells you a QR code was scanned many times. SampleSync tells you which firm kept returning to the same material passport over several weeks, and why that account may deserve a call. Same scans, completely different signal.
The short version
Use Uniqode if you need a general-purpose QR platform across multiple use cases (events, menus, marketing). Use SampleSync if you are a material producer and want to know exactly who is engaging with which sample and when it is worth following up.
Feature comparison
| Capability | Uniqode | SampleSync |
|---|---|---|
| Scan count per QR code | ||
| Scan location (city-level) | ||
| Scan device / OS breakdown | ||
| Holder identity capture (name, firm, email)Uniqode tracks anonymous scans only | ||
| B2B attribution — which firm is engaging | ||
| Material-specific data model (specs, certs, finishes) | ||
| Scan-triggered alert when a sample is re-engaged | ||
| Follow-up signal for sales team | ||
| Multi-use QR categories (menus, events, retail)SampleSync is built exclusively for material samples | ||
| Bulk QR generation | ||
| EU data hosting and GDPR compliance | ||
| Webhook integrations |
When Uniqode wins
- You need QR codes across multiple use cases — events, restaurant menus, product packaging, marketing campaigns
- Anonymous scan volume is sufficient — you do not need to know who is scanning
- You want a general-purpose platform that handles redirects, dynamic QR management, and bulk operations at scale
When SampleSync wins
- You are a material producer and need to know which firms are engaging with which samples
- You want each scan to capture the scanner's name, firm, and contact route for follow-up
- You need a material passport with specs, certifications, and files served from the same QR
- You want your sample engagement data connected to your sales process via alerts or webhooks